Emerging Economies Asia Pacific Countries †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Talk About The Emerging Economies Asia Pacific Countries? Answer: Introducation Chand (2005) expressed that the requirement for harmonization of bookkeeping norms has shown up because of creating single lot of top notch bookkeeping measures that can be utilized by business companies far and wide. The harmonization of bookkeeping guidelines will help in accomplishing compatibility between the money related revealing frameworks of various business elements that making it simple for the end-clients to break down and decipher the budgetary data uncovered by any business element. The IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) has coordinated the business enterprises the world over to set up their money related reports according to the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards). Nonetheless, the appropriation of IFRS in various nations is generally impacted by the nation explicit relevant issues that are limiting the harmonization of IFRS. All things considered, it tends to be said that the harmonization of IFRS is conceivable with the consolidated endeav ors of controllers, standard-setters, agents, business network and the bookkeeping experts. The different nations in the Asia-Pacific area have effectively embraced IFRS for improving the worldwide seriousness of their business companies (Chand, 2005). According to the Albu, Albu, and Alexander (2014), the usage of the IFRS norms by the Asia-Pacific nations has introduced different difficulties before the bookkeeping experts with respect to the utilization of reasonable worth bookkeeping. All things considered, the utilization of reasonable worth bookkeeping in Malaysia has revealed numerous difficulties because of nation explicit issues. The IFRS 13 standard has guided business substances to utilize reasonable worth bookkeeping as it gives practical data about the current market cost of benefits and liabilities. The reasonable worth bookkeeping is viewed to be better technique when contrasted with authentic cost approach that records the chronicled cost of advantages and liabilities. The bookkeeping standard setting bodies in Malaysia are stressing on the utilization of reasonable worth bookkeeping with the expanding requirement for securing the interests of the end-clients. There are different other rising Asia-Pacific economies that are receiving the utilization of reasonable worth bookkeeping approach other than Malaysia, for example, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore with the main special case of Bangladesh (Albu, Albu, and Alexander, 2014). As indicated by He, Wong and Young (2012), the verifiable cost bookkeeping strategy mirrors the underlying cost of advantages and liabilities at the hour of their buy and doesn't give any data connection to the current market valuation. Thusly, it needs unwavering quality and in this manner reasonable worth bookkeeping technique is to a great extent favored by the business partnerships in the Asia-Pacific nations to coordinate the necessities and desires for the end-clients of acknowledging solid data to be utilized in settling on speculation choices. The utilization of reasonable worth estimation methods by the business elements in Malaysia has encouraged the simple correlation and assessment of advantages and liabilities through the broadly useful fiscal summaries. It has helped in building up a precise methodology for esteeming the money related instruments of a business substance that gives solid and similar data about its budgetary exhibition. Additionally, the reasonable estima tion of advantages and liabilities likewise help in evaluating the anticipating their future qualities that can support the financial specialists and leasers to settle on educated choices (He, Wong and Young, 2012). Qu et al. (2012) expressed that the administrative Authority of Malaysia and the Malaysian Accounting Standards Board has ordered the open recorded organizations under the protections commission Malaysia for the utilization of reasonable worth bookkeeping yet at the same time it stays discretionary for privately owned businesses. Along these lines, it very well may be said that reasonable worth bookkeeping is as yet not received totally in the business enterprises of Malaysia. This is because of some analysis in regards to the utilization of reasonable worth methodology during the arrangement of the broadly useful budget summaries. The significant analysis as contended by many bookkeeping experts in regards to the utilization of this methodology is that it presents high instability in the budget summaries. This is on the grounds that the valuation gave by this methodology isn't satisfactory at times and hence it is said that instability is the cost of financial specialist certainty ( Qu et al., 2012). Reasonable Value Measurement actualized by the 2 Malaysian Companies and 2 Australian Companies So as to dissect the utilization of reasonable worth bookkeeping in the 2 Australian organizations and 2 Malaysian organizations, there is have to choose such organizations from the rundown accessible from the particular nations securities exchange. The 2 Australian organizations chose for this intention are Wesfarmers and Woolworths and 2 Malaysian organizations chose are BERHAD and MISC BERHAD. There is have to comprehend the appropriation of IFRS by the Malaysian Accounting Board before contrasting the bookkeeping of two nations. Before the reception of IFRS, Malaysian Accounting Board follows the US GAAP to play out their bookkeeping revealing work. After the usage of IFRS by the IAB for all the nations and made them compulsory for all, Malaysian Accounting Board has chosen to take IFRS and made their own nation Malaysian GAAP which will be pertinent on the recorded organizations under the Malaysian stock trade. The guidelines alluded to in the Malaysian GAAP are known as Malaysia Financial Reporting Standards. In Australia, AASB deals with the appropriation of the bookkeeping standard and their execution in their money related announcing rules. After the presentation of IFRS, AASB has chosen to make changes in their AASB (Accounting standard) so that there will closeness between them. The utilization of reasonable estimation of estimation as portrayed under IFRS 13 has h elped a great deal in esteeming the advantages and liabilities in the books of records (AASB13, 2015). This has improved the capacity of clients of the yearly report to decipher the budgetary data and to gauge the benefit of the organization. There is nearly comparability between the Australian GAAP and Malaysian GAAP with respect to the revelations made for the reasonable worth estimation as both the nations has received the gauges characterized in IFRS. In the wake of taking a gander at the budgetary reports of both the organizations of Malaysian organizations (Pensonic Holding BERHAD and MISC BERHAD) it has been discovered that MFRS 13 is utilized for estimating the honest assessment of benefits and liabilities. MFRS 13 (Accounting of Financial Instruments) has been overhauled in year 2011 keeping in see the IFRS 13 measures in regards to the equivalent (MASB, 2017). MFRS 139 permits the blended estimation of the three primary classifications and they are estimation of far reachi ng pay, acknowledged benefit or misfortune and amortized cost (MISC BERHAD, 2016). Comparable to estimation of the money related instruments, the higher of cost or last realized market cost on the off chance that the dynamic market cites are not known to the organization. Notwithstanding this there are numerous suppositions that are expected to make by the organization before introducing the money related report (Pensonic Holding BERHAD, 2016). This incorporates use strategies of valuation that is identified with utilization of contributions from showcase and different evaluations. The reasonable worth bookkeeping utilized by both the Malaysian organizations is given under notes to accounts with nitty gritty depiction of every estimation (MISC BERHAD, 2016 and Pensonic Holding BERHAD, 2016). Then again, Australian GAAP (AASB 13) characterizes the idea of reasonable worth estimation. For the most part all the focuses have been duplicated from the IFRS 13 with some little contrasts to modify with necessity of Australian organizations. So as to more readily introduce the distinction, the accompanying table will support a ton (Wesfarmers, 2016 and Woolworths Group, 2016). Distinction between Fair Value Measurement by the Australian Companies and Malaysian Companies Segment of Income Statement of asset report AASB 13 ramifications upon and as executed by the Australian Companies MFRS 13 ramifications upon and as executed by the Malaysian Companies Arrangement of Consolidated Financial Statements Australian organizations have introduced their monetary things at authentic cost premise other than the budgetary instruments that are ready to move (Wesfarmers, 2016 and Woolworths Group, 2016). Malaysian Companies have likewise introduced their money related things at verifiable cost premise yet their no portrayal about the budgetary instruments (MISC BERHAD, 2016 and Pensonic Holding BERHAD, 2016). Things identified with business mix Australian Companies utilize the honest assessment idea to gauge the estimation of organization to be procured yet there are no characterized rules with respect to the equivalent, for example, if business blend has been done in portion than there will no understanding of revaluation of benefits or monetary instruments. Malaysian organizations have followed the arrangement of obviously characterized presumptions with respect to the expense of securing and their estimation in books of records. Altruism and other elusive resources There is isolated bookkeeping standard that manages the bookkeeping of elusive resources. Generosity is estimated after the business mix at cost (at first) and after that it is treated with any disability misfortune (Wesfarmers, 2016 and Woolworths Group, 2016). Here, altruism is estimated in same route as Australian organizations do however there is distinction of introduction under notes to accounts. Depreciable Assets Resources that are introduced under the non-current resources area are estimated in the wake of deducting the deterioration for the year from their book esteem. There is additionally an idea of charging deterioration as per their staying helpful life now and again (Wesfarmers, 2016 and Woolworths Group, 2016). Malaysian Companies follows same idea as Australian co

Risk Management in Business: A Case Study

Hazard Management in Business: A Case Study Presentation Circumstance Consistently, quite possibly a business interference, emergency, debacle, or crisis will happen. Anything that forestalls access to key procedures and exercises can be characterized as a fiasco. Organizations can encounter a wide range of dangers to their strategic frameworks, for example, fires, floods, lightning tempests and stickiness to displeased workers, programmers, human mistake, power disappointments and infections. A fiasco can occur whenever and it is imperative to be set up if one happens. NEED To be set up for a business interference, the association must have a deliberately made and extensive arrangement that depicts dangers, effects, and bit by bit recuperation procedures for basic business forms in different catastrophe and crisis situations. Without an arrangement, the group will be flying visually impaired when an interference happens. The arrangement gives the important instruments to relieve interferences and resume tasks as fast as could be expected under the circumstances, incredibly encouraging dynamic and making a move when there is inadequate time and feelings of anxiety are raised. CHALLENGE Utilizing the data in the hazard appraisal to make powerful recuperation systems for basic procedures in all offices, joining these techniques into a complete business coherence plan, and empowering responsibility for plan over the association, and at last, accomplishing the most elevated strength conceivable with constrained assets. Arrangement Make the recuperation methodologies division by-office, process-by-process. This permits every division to concentrate on techniques explicitly applicable to their basic procedures without superfluous data from different offices. Do likewise for your business progression plan, composing littler plans by office. Additionally, utilize a layout to archive your recuperation techniques to guarantee process consistency over the association. At long last, have plans audited and endorsed by division heads and disseminated to all representatives to energize proprietorship and pride in the arrangement. RESULT Every division in the association will have a far reaching activity plan for business progression plotting the means to take to recuperate imperative procedures in different crisis situations. All workers will have their own duplicate of the arrangement, prepared to utilize quickly when a disturbance happens. Workers will take responsibility for associations business congruity exertion and this exertion will be additionally instilled in the associations corporate culture. CHOCOLATE MANUFACTURING COMPANY AN OVERVIEW The Chocolate Company since commencement in 1990 has been to a great extent answerable for fulfilling the countrys interest for Chocolates and Sugar Confectionery. Arranged at Rusayl Industrial Estates in Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, the plant has different lines creating a wide scope of ice cream parlor like Éclairs, Toffees, Fudges, Caramels, Hard Boiled Candy and Enrobed Chocolates. These items are accessible in appealing bundling and premium Gift Boxes making them perfect for gifting just as for own utilization. The greater part of the bundling in the Gift Pack portion has been deliberately chosen to guarantee its suffering utility, in this way giving our esteemed clients an additional advantage. The dessert shop is delivered by experienced work force under rigid quality control and cleanliness norms. Cutting edge fabricating offices guarantee results of universal quality. The organization in its persistent quest for quality acquired HACCP Certification in April, 2004. The Company, through its firm remain on quality and serious evaluating, has effectively infiltrated nations everywhere throughout the Gulf, the African mainland, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, South Africa, USA and the UK. The essential business forms included are Acquisition of crude materials and consumables. Creation and Quality control. Dispersion and promoting. Stock Management. Evaluating and cost control. Criticism from shoppers and redressal frameworks. Exposure and limited time exercises. Enlistment and HR. Fund Administration. Corporate interchanges and advertising. Legitimate and secretarial issues. Financial specialist relations. Support of hardware and different resources. Capital use for hardware and different purposes. IT frameworks and broadcast communications. Transportation and Logistics. Today, producing area organizations like chocolate fabricating works in progressively mind boggling, serious and worldwide markets. The capacity to oversee hazards across geologies, items, resources, client sections and practical offices is of fundamental significance. The failure to deal with these dangers can cause unsalvageable harms. Chocolate organization will consistently confront the probability of being affected by unsure or antagonistic future occasions. These vulnerabilities will affect a companys capacity to create capital and investors returns. The organization Board expects that administration won't just glance at where the organization might be presented to hazard, yet in addition how these dangers can be figured out how to impact good business results. Hazard AND RISK MANAGEMENT Hazard Management Methodology followed by the chocolate organization The hazard the board technique at the chocolate organization envelop the extent of dangers to be dealt with, the procedure/frameworks and methodology to oversee chance and the jobs and obligations of people associated with chance administration. The structure is sufficiently thorough to catch all dangers that the organization is presented to and have adaptability to oblige any adjustment in business exercises. The chocolate companys powerful hazard the board philosophy incorporates Hazard Policy structure. Distinguishing proof of dangers. Estimation and Impact Assessment. The board of the dangers. Checking Reporting and Control. A. Hazard Policy Framework The accompanying key standards ought to be considered by the organization to create and actualize a proactive hazard the executives program and help them to distinguish any potential territories of concern: Acknowledgment of a hazard the executives system: A proper hazard the board structure is required at this organization, to direct the reconciliation of hazard the board into the companys everyday tasks. Corporate administration and hazard: At this company,corporate administration is the prime duty of the Board of Directors and the General Manager. It consolidates legitimate obligations with duties to improve and screen the exhibition of the organization. Set up the hazard reaction system: Following the concurrence on the hazard evaluation rankings in every useful division, the executives activity should be taken to decrease the hazard levels where they have been regarded unsuitably high or then again expel limitations where they are keeping the business from seeking after circumstances. Allotting obligation regarding hazard the executives change process: It is significant for the organization to guarantee that the every day activity of the business underpins this methodology and that the staff comprehends the proposed changes. Re-sourcing: Risk the executives is the obligation of all degrees of the board. Correspondence and preparing: Implementing a correspondence and preparing program is imperative to present the idea of hazard the executives. Observing of hazard the board procedure: To guarantee that chance reactions holes are filled and that the hazard reactions keep on working successfully and stay proper considering evolving conditions. B. Distinguishing proof of Various Risks of The Company While drafting this Risk the executives Policy, the essential hazard exposures at the organization X that are recognized is given underneath, which are comprehensive yet not thorough and it will be the obligation of the Risk Management Committee to survey these on an occasional premise. I. Market Risks The hazard the estimation of the organization will be antagonistically influenced by developments in advertise rates or costs, outside trade rates, national worldwide vacillations, credit spreads and additionally ware costs bringing about a misfortune to profit and capital. The market dangers recognized at this chocolate organization are as per the following Government Policy dangers Item Risks Ecological dangers Instability of fare orders Value Competition in the neighborhood trade advertise Cash change for trade orders II. Operational Risks The operational dangers distinguished at chocolate organization are as per the following Fire Allied Risks Hardware breakdown/out of date quality Instability of Raw material Packing material costs Quality/Aging dangers of Raw material/Packing material Conveyance danger of Suppliers Loss of information data IT security Labor Availability dangers Mishaps Stock conveying hazard III. Notoriety Risks These are dangers emerging from negative popular feeling coming about because of disappointments of procedure, system or corporate administration. The Reputation dangers distinguished at this organization are as per the following Tainting cleanliness Item expiry/Shelf life Corporate Governance IV. Credit Risks Non receipt of receivables or postponement in receipts is the credit dangers owing to the organization. These might be recognized as Installment chance from clients neighborhood Installment chance from Customers-trade Security from clients Advance to Suppliers V. Liquidity Risks The chance is that the organization will be not able to support present and future money related commitments. These might be recognized as Income working capital administration CAPEX choices Cost overwhelms VI. Key Risks Hazard those are emerging from antagonistic business choices or the ill-advised execution of such choices. These might be recognized as follows Marketable strategy conjectures. Wearing down of key individuals. C. Hazard Prioritizing and Impact Assessment Hazard Prioritizing To sufficiently catch organizations chance presentation, chance estimation ought to speak to total introduction of the organization to both hazard type and business line and incorporate short run just as since quite a while ago run sway on I

John Fitzgerald Kennedy

John Fitzgerald Kennedy was one of the most persuasive and darling President’s of United States history.â However, his demise is covered in mystery.â When everything is said and done, scheme scholars have left practically no stone unturned trying to clarify the deplorability of November 22, 1963.â Clearly Lee Harvey Oswald was available and shot a gun.â But did his projectile kill JFK? Did he act alone?â Many individuals have their own thoughts of what truly happened that day.One regular hypothesis is that the Cuban government requested a hit on the President.â The President had endeavored to attack Cuba, and however the arrangement fizzled, Castro realized that further plans were in the works.â Likewise, Kennedy had made a few ineffective endeavors on Castro’s life.â â Getting free of Kennedy would surely empower Castro to keep control of Cuba (Anders 1993).A comparable hypothesis is that enemy of Castro Cubans killed Kennedy.â Perhaps they were t rusting that if the doubt were centered around Castro, America would request retaliation.â Later, proof appeared to surface from a previous Castro employable that Oswald was really recruited by the Cuban government (Anders 1993, McAdams 2004).  With Oswald’s passing, the realities of these reports couldn't be confirmed, however Castro ardently denies this report.Similarly, Russia, the US cold war adversary, was troubled by JFK’s youth and flighty nature.â He would be fit for raising the virus war to an out and out World War III. With the presentation of atomic innovation, the dread of a US strike on Russia was additionally a concern.â Therefore, the Russians arranged the assassination.â In a related hypothesis, this request originated from Nikita Khrushchev himself (Anders 1993).Another mainstream hypothesis is that the mafia requested a hit on Kennedy.â Initially, some huge name wrongdoing managers, for example, Sam Giancana worked with Jimmy Hoffa and the teamsters to get President Kennedy chose, especially through votes in Ohio ( Unfortunately, President Kennedy and his sibling Robert Kennedy, the US Attorney General, had later ventured up indictments of mafia individuals to an exceptional high (Odoni 2005; McAdams 2004) J. Edgar Hoover, who was not well disposed with President Kennedy, was expected to be constrained into retirement from his situation of the Director of the FBI.Hoover had a background marked by fail to indict mafia members.â His retirement would mean the finish of these favors, particularly if JFK named his sibling Robert to that position. After Kennedy’s passing, Hoover stayed as the leader of the FBI for ten additional years. During that time, mafia arraignments fell significantly. James Files, a mafia hit man, really admitted to the homicide, demonstrating that Giancana had requested the hit.â Oswald’s executioner, Jack Ruby, was a little league criminal with a couple of significant mafia co nnections.â He could have murdered Oswald to quiet him (Odoni 2005).Two similarly contended speculations that are additionally disturbing are those that involve the United States itself.â Many presume Vice-President Lyndon B. Johnson.â He picked up the Presidency after Kennedy’s demise, however he was not loved by the general population; Kennedy was wanting to drop Johnson from his ticket in 1964.â He was engaged with four significant criminal examinations including pay off, tax evasion, contract infringement and misappropriation of assets, at the hour of Kennedy’s death.In truth, Kennedy regularly grumbled that he had been controlled into designating Johnson by the FBI and that Johnson went about as a covert agent for J. Edgar Hoover.â After he became President, Johnson’s criminal examinations were dropped (Ayton no date). Another US based hypothesis is that the CIA itself had killed the President to conceal or divert consideration from its new act of killing remote leaders.â The Church Committee was shaped to investigate this conceivable embarrassment yet inferred that while the CIA was expanding in national and universal force, it was not liable for the demise of the President (Ayton no date).The Warren Commission heard declaration from 552 observers and 10 government organizations over the range of 10 months as it researched the death and all the related connivance theories.â Published in October of 1964, it reasoned that, essentially, Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, shooting three shots from the 6th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository (McAdams 2004).The single slug that injured Connally and killed JFK hit him from behind as the motorcade passed by the Depository. Nonetheless, the issue has not been laid to rest.â Four of the seven individuals from the investigatory group appeared to demonstrate distrust about the Commissions discoveries (McAdams 2004).â Several individual bits of the Commission's discover ies likewise have been raised doubt about since its completion.Kennedy was struck by two bullets.â One hit him in the back, and one hit him in the head.â The subsequent hit killed the President.â The single slug hypothesis was conceived on the grounds that Oswald’s firearm would not have had the option to discharge sufficiently quick to hit both Kennedy and Connally with isolated shots (McAdams 2004).However, the possibility that a solitary projectile went through Kennedy’s back, left his throat, went through the seat of a vehicle, entered Connally’s back, left his chest, went through his wrist and entered his thigh has been genuinely addressed by proof from observers, including traveler Nellie Connally, and measurable proof (McAdams 2004) Now this hypothesis is known as the enchantment projectile theory.â The projectile which had such an inconceivable excursion wound up on an emergency clinic cot in close to immaculate condition (McAdams 2004).Medical a ssessments and missing x-beams and examination pictures additionally add to the mystery.â Kennedy was taken first to Dallas’ Parkland Hospital where 44 specialists and clinical staff members guaranteed that the leave twisted was at the rear of JFK’s head.â This would have been outlandish if the shot originated from the Depository and lended itself to the lush glade hypothesis (Odoni 2005).However, two specialists at Bethesda Medical Center, the second clinic Kennedy was taken to, announced that the exit would was at the front of the head (McAdams, 2004).â Why at that point did more than 44 specialists and clinical staff members guarantee that the injury was at the back of the head?â X-beams that a Parkland Hospital expert professes to have taken have never been found.â Pictures of the post-mortem that rose as long as four years after the death are dubious and don't coordinate records given by witnesses.All taking all things together, the Warren Commission app eared to disregard 44 specialists and 20 onlookers at the homicide scene.â Other proof was destroyed.â Governor Connally’s shirt from the day of the shooting was laundered at Johnson’s demand inside 24 hours (McAdams 2004).â The vehicle conveying the Kennedys and the Connallys was promptly cleaned and revamped as opposed to being altogether inspected for ballistic evidence.â This was likewise requested by Lyndon B. Johnson (McAdams 2004). Any criminological proof that may have been given by these things was lost.Nobody will ever truly comprehend what happened that day in 1964.â However, it appears that the â€Å"facts† are obviously not what they appear and that the Warren Commission didn't dig into the disparities tooâ deeply.â The speculations referenced here are on the whole reasonable hypotheses that were not analyzed intently, if by any means, by the specialists. The possibility of a â€Å"magic† shot is preposterous.â â It appears t hat something is being concealed. Be that as it may, what?ReferencesAnders, P. (1993). An Introduction to JFK Conspiracy Theories. Remain Free 4. Accessible from:  â â â â â â â â â â http://www.stayfreemagazine.org/4/jfk.htm [accessed 10 August 2006]Ayton, M. (no date).â Questions of Conspiracy. Spartacus UK. Accessible from: [accessed 10 August 2006]McAdams, J. (2004). The Kennedy Assassination. Accessible from: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm [accessed 10 August 2006]Odoni, Martin. (2005). Who Killed JFK? Current Affairs. Accessible from:â  â â â â â â â â â â http://havetstorm.tripod.com/currentaffairs/id7.htmlâ [accessed 10 August 2006]

Vershire free essay sample

The Weakness of Vershire Company is assessment framework is by being somewhat excessively unassuming by just using the changes investigation. This sort of investigation for the most part just gives the outcomes however has no ability in announcing the causes. 5. On balance, would you reâ€design the administration control structure at Vershire Company ? Clarify ! a. First is in the style of their spending arrangement. Their business spending readiness had little adaptability when it was endorsed before the beginning of the year and were at that point fixed goals. This sort of framework has a bit of leeway of pushing its chiefs to endeavor and meet the goal spending plans. Be that as it may, it is a drawback when there are unexpected pertinent costs that are unavoidable and must be caused during the year since there is a fastidious procedure in taking care of these costs, which additionally requires a clarification to the supervisors why the financial plans have not been met. b. The second is the way the organization treats its Plants/Manufacturing Department as the Profit Centers. This division just achieves orders that the Sales Department direct, fabricating the quality items at the least sensible cost conceivable thinking about the idea of the serious business. In any case, their exhibition is assessed through the benefits that the division produces by means of its cost measures and cost decrease targets. The task of the office as a cost place might be conflicting with itsobjectives since the division itself isn't the one deciding the cost and selling the items. c. Third is the way the plant directors execution is assessed. Since the Department of Plant is treated as benefit focus, the chiefs advancements and pay appraisals likewise dependent on their profir execution.

Cuándo un Divorcio Afecta la Residencia

Cundo un Divorcio Afecta la Residencia Una de las formas ms rpidas y frecuentes de obtener laâ tarjeta de residencia permanenteâ es mediante el matrimonio, bien ocean celebrado en Estados Unidos o en otro paã ­s. Pero  ¿quã © sucede con la green card si la relaciã ³n termina en divorcio? Es importante resaltar que la residencia solo se ver afectada si el beneficiario obtuvo su estatus migratorio exclusivamente por matrimonio. Si la persona llegã ³ an Estados Unidos con una visa de trabajo, se casã ³ posteriormente con un ciudadano americano y luego se divorciã ³, su estatus migratorio no est en peligro. Estos child los dos casos en los que el divorcio afecta la residencia del cã ³nyuge beneficiario: Si el divorcio sucede bets de que se reciba la green card: entre la entrega de papeles a la oficina de USCIS y la obtenciã ³n de la tarjeta de residencia pueden pasar entre seis y doce meses. Si el divorcio sucede bets de que se reciba la tarjeta, el beneficiario pierde todos los derechos. Si el divorcio sucede por maltrato o violencia de parte del ciudadano americano, el no-residente tiene opciones para quedarse legalmente (esta lã ­nea 1-800-799-7233 puede ser de gran ayuda).Si el divorcio sucede cuando la residencia es transient: si la residencia se obtuvo de manera fleeting (dos aã ±os) porque los papeles se presentaron bets de los dos aã ±os de casados, el beneficiario pierde los beneficios migratorios. Quienes recibieron la residencia permanente y piden el divorcio al poco tiempo de recibida la green card deben saber que: Un futuro proceso de naturalizaciã ³n (ciudadanã ­a) puede stanza afectado dado que el matrimonio podrã ­a parecer no legitimo.Un futuro proceso de renovaciã ³n de la residencia puede generar preguntas acerca de la naturaleza del matrimonio y las causas del divorcio.Los procesos de inmigraciã ³n en todos los puertos pueden generar preguntas acerca de la naturaleza del matrimonio y las causas del divorcio.Un futuro matrimonio entre el beneficiario de la green card y otro inmigrante no tiene beneficios de residencia por cinco aã ±os. Quienes obtengan su residencia por matrimonio, se divorcien, y se casen nuevamente, debern esperar cinco aã ±os desde que obtuvieron su green card para pedir beneficios para su nuevo esposo/a. Quienes patrocinaron a su cã ³nyuge inmigrante deben saber que: Al firmar el oath of help estn comprometidos durante aã ±os a la manutenciã ³n econã ³mica de su pareja, asã ­ estã ©n legalmente divorciados.  ¿Quà © Hacer Antes de Divorciarse? Bets de hacer el papeleo de divorcio es importante asesorarse de un abogado de inmigraciã ³n, sobretodo en los casos en los que no existen pruebas documentales que sirvan para apoyar el carcter del matrimonio (propiedades o cuentas de banco conjuntas, viajes, hijos en comã ºn, fotos, facturas). Este artã ­culo es informativo y no pretende ser asesorã ­a lawful.